The ban on TikTok in Nepal triggered discussions about more than just the content of the app. While the ban was officially due to concerns about the appropriateness of the content, it also raised questions about the underlying intentions or agendas and the implications for freedom of expression.

Some argue that the ban was politically motivated, using content concerns as an excuse to control the narrative on social media. Others debate that the ban was necessary to protect users, especially younger demographics, from exposure to harmful content.

The ban on TikTok highlights the complexities of regulating social media platforms. It is important to find a balance between safeguarding against inappropriate content and upholding democratic values of free expression and access to information.

Tauko ma jumra paryo vandai ma tauko nai kaatdine?

The proverb highlights the importance of finding a balanced
approach to address problems. Just as cutting your head is an extremely odd response to lice, banning a platform like TikTok is an extreme response to concerns about content. A more refined approach is needed that addresses the root causes of the problem without sacrificing fundamental rights and freedom.

Nishant Adhikari